top of page

More parking, fewer bike lanes: City of Boston, T release new Blue Hill Avenue Redesign

1 hour ago
5 min read

Afternoon rush-hour traffic moved along Blue Hill Ave in Mattapan in June. DANIELLE PARHIZKARAN/GLOBE STAFF
Afternoon rush-hour traffic moved along Blue Hill Ave in Mattapan in June. DANIELLE PARHIZKARAN/GLOBE STAFF

For years, residents and politicians have railed against the plan to reconfigure Blue Hill

Avenue and the impact that proposed bus and bike lanes could unleash on the busy

corridor through the heart of Black Boston.


Now city officials and the MBTA say they’ve funneled those concerns into a new design

that preserves a controversial center-running bus lane but significantly expands the

portions of the boulevard with two traffic lanes on each side.


The new plan shrinks the amount of proposed bike lanes to dedicate more of the road to

motor vehicle travel and parking between Grove Hall and Mattapan Square, effectively

creating a more car-friendly design.



Mayor Michelle Wu billed the plan as a “generationally transformational” layout, with $163 million in improvements to public transit and other public works that she said the

“worn and dated” thoroughfare desperately needs.


What it offers, Wu said, is “basically a full reconstruction that represents the biggest

investment in this transportation corridor in decades.”


The redesign also includes what officials called beautification improvements all along

Blue Hill Avenue, including newly repaved sidewalks, better street lighting, and 200

trees.


City officials and the T will host four public meetings on this proposal, starting Thursday

through Sept. 30. They’re aiming to finalize the design by the end of 2027. Phased

construction would begin the next year and last through 2030.


The layout marks the latest move to get the project underway since Boston launched the

redesign seven years ago, and there’s $95 million in federal funding on the line if it

doesn’t move forward. The state, the city, and the T are committing another $64 million

altogether.


In other parts of Boston, the Wu administration has faced scrutiny for stalling bike and

street safety improvement projects for years, before promising in July a slew of changes— including more concrete barriers on bike lanes— in the wake of the death of Boston

city planner and cyclist Louisa Gag.


But the fine-tuning on bike lanes for Blue Hill Avenue does little to change the

conversation around the issue that has generated the most pushback: the center-running

bus lane.


And it comes as critics have complained about how City Hall treats their input on

neighborhood projects, as well a longstanding frustration about decades of neglect on the

avenue dating to the 1950s, when the streetcar trolley along it was eliminated.


Another similar rapid bus transit project through Blue Hill Avenue died in 2009.


Earlier this year, Boston City Councilors Brian Worrell and Miniard Culpepper even

recommended replacing the center-running bus lane with an extension of the

Orange Line. The T vowed to study the option but suggested refocusing on “immediate

improvements.”


Some of those are laid out in the newest design.


Roughly 11 of the 14 existing miles of roadway in either direction would be preserved for

motor vehicles with two or more general-purpose traffic lanes. That’s far more than a

previous design in which 60 percent of the road would have had two lanes in either

direction.

The current layout of Blue Hill Ave. near Morningstar Baptist Church. CITY OF BOSTON
The current layout of Blue Hill Ave. near Morningstar Baptist Church. CITY OF BOSTON
The proposed changes to Blue Hill Ave. near Morningstar Baptist Church. CITY OF BOSTON
The proposed changes to Blue Hill Ave. near Morningstar Baptist Church. CITY OF BOSTON

Five blocks along Blue Hill Avenue would also be subject to rush-hour changes, in which

parking lanes would transform into travel lanes during peak traffic times.


There are other special carveouts: The design proposes creating a separated

“carriageway” near Franklin Park to make boarding buses easier, while a section in Grove

Hall would have a designated zone for safe school pickup and drop-off.


The new layout would increase the number of parking spaces to 717 from 675. Notably,

the plan would cut the number of all-day parking spaces by 10, but offset those losses with 52 spots available outside of traffic-heavy windows.


Near the Morningstar Baptist Church, for example, cars would be allowed to park on the

median on Sundays.


The bike lanes previously proposed in both directions along Blue Hill Avenue and

through Mattapan Square are gone in the new plan. Instead, officials suggested creating a

two-way separated bike path on the avenue along Franklin Park, and another from

American Legion Highway to Woodhaven Street.


And the proposed improvements extend well beyond the roadway itself. The design

includes plans for six miles of rebuilt sidewalks with accessible curb ramps and 19 new

walk signals.


Altogether, the addition of the center-running bus lane and bus boarding platforms is

expected to reduce travel times for 40,000 daily bus riders by 10 to 15 minutes. Car

traffic would be faster in the proposed layout than the previous design, officials estimate.

State Representative Russell Holmes, whose district covers much of the corridor, said the

design is proof officials have “changed everywhere that we can” in response to

community feedback.


“Everybody has their desires, and no one gets everything they want,” the Mattapan

Democrat said. “But this is about balancing bikes, bus riders, cars, walkers, and students.


It’s about everybody.”


But not everyone is satisfied with the latest layout.


Dianne Wilkerson, a former Massachusetts state senator and critic of the project, said the

new design does not address her and other community members’ primary concern about

the center-running bus lane.


“We will not be in the only community . . . that would require our elders and parents

pushing baby carriages to run to the middle of the street and risk their lives to get on the

bus,” said Wilkerson, who accused public officials of not giving the same credence to the

objections from the Black community as they do from white, wealthier residents. ”'No’

can’t mean ‘no’ from every other neighborhood of the city except for the three places

disconnected from the rest of the transit system for 40 years.”


Worrell, the city councilor who suggested extending the Orange Line, believes Boston

still should study a rail expansion before locking Blue Hill Avenue into a “bus-only

future.”


“Rail here has never been thought about seriously,” Worrell said. “Is this a transportation

plan, or just a center-running bus lane plan? It doesn’t take into consideration the best

way to provide public transportation to thousands of residents who use transit here.”


Kahlil Cooper, a program manager at the Mattapan Food and Fitness Coalition, lauded

the new design for prioritizing local bus riders, who make up about half the travelers on

Blue Hill Avenue on any given day.


“The city was able to effectively listen to the community and change pieces that people

had gripes about,” Cooper said. “But at what point do you put your foot down and say we

cannot make any more changes because of timeline constraints? At what point does the

discussion end?”


 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


bottom of page